Colonel Russell Williams

                                                                                                             

Gerald Brummel details the inconsistencies of the 'story' ....
DIRTY COPS WEBSITE

National Post reports that a few days before his arrest, Williams asked for and received a photo of Stephen Harper in a flight simulator with a defense company executive  ?????????
National Post 2011-09-29

Note: Same OPP Officer Jim Smyth is the 'hero' cop who gets confessions on high profile cases
National Post 2010-10-22 Russell Williams
National Post 2012-03-30 Michael Rafferty
National Post 2010-05-31 Luka Magnotta


Jim Smyth's tactics are called into question
National Post 2011-10-24 Derailed Murder Case
National Post 2011-11-25 Interrogation Tactic Scrutiny

Russel Williams and Queen Elizabeth pictured together

One of William's Victims is suing Police
DETAILS

William's Wife, last name HARRIMAN(!) makes statement
DETAILS

Deborah Rashotte Missing in same time frame, found deceased- still unsolved ..
DETAILS 
                                 Below: Russell Williams AKA Russell Sovka

RUSSELL WILLIAMS BIO & INFO

                               Below: Paul Bernardo. Russ Sovka/Williams

BERNARDO & WILLIAMS COINCIDENCE?

                                Above: Appearance of tension (Williams & Defense Minister)
                               
                                Below: In contrast, Mackay & Harper show no tension whatsoever.
                            
     
Watching the interrogation video of Russell Williams in a different context may ring a bell ...
Clips:
Interrogation Part 1                       
Interrogation Part 2
Interrogation Part 3
Full:
Complete Interrogation

RUSSELL WILLIAMS WIKIPEDIA

Lots to learn!

Be careful playing around that rabbit hole Alice... things will never be the same ....

Family Secrets

It’s time to meet the world’s bloodiest war monger – Prince Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha; 19 July 1884 – 6 March 1954), he was the fourth reigning Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (German: Herzog von Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha).

Who is this family? The Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha clan occupy the British throne TODAY and live at Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and another 30 or so royal palaces. The queen owns the Duchy of Lancaster which is a vast European network of giant landholdings which also include two duchies in Germany under the control of her Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha family.

Prince Charles Edward, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha was the head of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha from 1900 until his death in 1954. A male-line grandson of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, he was a Prince of the United Kingdom and held the British title of Duke of Albany.

His status as Sovereign Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, part of the German Empire, during World War I shows that he was responsible for ‘engineering’ the world wars of the 20th century. He was titled as a British Prince and British Royal Highness – in 1919, he decided to engineer the geopolitical groups which evolved into the NAZI killing machine and subsequently assisted in his family’s funding of the Burma opium trade, and his same family are related to the Romanovs of Russia.

Cumulatively, nearly all European wars, Viet Nam, the Chinese-British Opium Wars and the stripping of oil reserves and illegal occupation of many countries can be traced to this man and his grand children. His family investments in the armaments industry have played crucial roles in wars, war zones, landline planting and civil war on every continent of planet Earth. He is the maternal grandfather of Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden, who is the most senior royal Freemason of Europe.

Prince Charles Edward was born at Claremont House near Esher, Surrey, and educated at Sandringham. His godparents were his paternal grandmother Queen Victoria, his paternal uncle the Prince of Wales, his paternal aunts Princess Christian of Schleswig-Holstein (same family as the Duke of Edinburgh). His uncle, Edward VII, made him a Knight of the Garter on 15 July 1902, just prior to his 18th birthday, and he paraded at the ceremony in the grounds of Windsor castle where his descendants have ensconced themselves.

On 11th October 1905, at Glücksburg Castle, Schleswig-Holstein, the Duke married Princess Victoria Adelaide of Schleswig-Holstein (31 December 1885 – 3 October 1970), the eldest daughter of Duke Friedrich Ferdinand of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg. This is the full family name of the Duke of Edinburgh – so, as you can see, we are ruled by Bavarian-British royals.

He joined and funded the Nazi Party from 1935 onwards and became a member of the SA (Brownshirts), rising to the rank of Obergruppenführer. Remember – he was raised as a BRITISH PRINCE. He also served as a member of the Reichstag representing the Nazi Party from 1937 to 1945.

When World War II ended, the American Military Government in Bavaria, under the command of General George S. Patton, placed Charles Edward under ‘house arrest’ at his main royal residence, the vast Veste Coburg palace. BEHIND EVERY GREAT MAN THERE IS A WOMAN. In this particular case it was his sister, Princess Alice who pleaded for his release with his American captors.

His sister was also a war monger and race-hate specialist – Princess Alice was Vicereine of the apartheid-murdering regime of South Africa and then Canada. She was also the Colonel-in-Chief of two British Army units and one Rhodesian Army unit – Rhodesia was named after Sir Cecil Rhodes and is one of the places where this family of psychopaths get their vast stocks of diamonds. During the Second World War, she was Honorary Air Commandant of the Royal Canadian Air Force.

After the second world war they played a cat and mouse game with investments stretching across China (Hong Kong opium), Viet Nam (Opium), Russia (minerals), Canada (minerals) and of course kept a vast portfolio of war investments including subsidiaries and collaborators with Lockheed Martin and other contractors. In 1953, Prince Charles Edward travelled to a local cinema to watch the Coronation of his cousin’s granddaughter, Elizabeth II.

This family have managed to crush the ancient nations of Europe and create a vast SUPERSTATE of faceless bureaucrats who now issue laws and dictate and have a unified currency which they control from Buckingham Palace.
Christopher Everard

TAP – quite interesting piece – especially when you think that Queen Victoria was the illegitimate daughter of Nathan Mayer Rothschild, and Hitler was the grandson of her half brother Lionel Rothschild.   Churchill was the grandson of Queen Victoria.  His real father was Edward 7th the then Prince of Wales Bertie.  Lots of Rothschild history to be found at -

The Tap Blog is a collective of like-minded researchers and writers who’ve joined forces to distribute information and voice opinions avoided by the world’s media.

Source: http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-man-which-hitler-described-as.html

Denial - Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the politics of science/history and public policy, see Denialism. For other uses, see Denial (disambiguation).

Part of a series of articles on
Psychoanalysis
Concepts[hide] Psychosexual development Psychosocial development (Erikson) Unconscious Preconscious Consciousness Psychic apparatus Id, ego and super-ego Libido Drive Transference Countertransference Ego defenses Resistance Projection Denial
Important figures[show]
Important works[show]
Schools of thought[show]
Training[show]
Psychology portal
v t e

Denial, in ordinary English usage, is asserting that a statement or allegation is not true.^[1] The same word, and also abnegation, is used for a psychological defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.^[1][2]

The subject may use:

• simple denial: deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether
• minimisation: admit the fact but deny its seriousness (a combination of denial and rationalization)
• projection: admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility by blaming somebody or something else.

The concept of denial is particularly important to the study of addiction. The theory of denial was first researched seriously by Anna Freud. She classified denial as a mechanism of the immature mind, because it conflicts with the ability to learn from and cope with reality. Where denial occurs in mature minds, it is most often associated with death, dying and rape. More recent research has significantly expanded the scope and utility of the concept.Elisabeth Kübler-Ross used denial as the first of five stages in the psychology of a dying patient, and the idea has been extended to include the reactions of survivors to news of a death.^[3]

Many contemporary psychoanalysts treat denial as the first stage of a coping cycle. When an unwelcome change occurs, a trauma of some sort, the first impulse to disbelieve begins the process of coping. That denial, in a healthy mind, slowly rises to greater consciousness. Gradually becoming a subconscious pressure, just beneath the surface of overt awareness, the mechanism of coping then involves repression, while the person accumulates the emotional resources to fully face the trauma. Once faced, the person deals with the trauma in a stage alternately called acceptance or enlightenment, depending on the scope of the issue and the therapist's school of thought. After this stage, once sufficiently dealt with, or dealt with for the time being, the trauma must sink away from total conscious awareness again. Left metaphorically upon a back burner or put away in a cupboard, the process of sublimation involves a balance of neither quite forgetting nor quite remembering. This allows the trauma to re-emerge in consciousness if it involves an ongoing process such as a protracted illness. Or sublimation may begin the full resolution process, where the trauma finally sinks away into eventual forgetfulness. Occasionally this entire cycle has been referred to in modern parlance as denial, often confusing the full cycle with only one stage in the cycle.^[4]

Unlike some other defense mechanisms postulated by psychoanalytic theory (for instance, repression), the general existence of denial is fairly easy to verify, even for non-specialists. On the other hand, denial is one of the most controversial defense mechanisms, since it can be easily used to create unfalsifiable theories: anything the subject says or does that appears to disprove the interpreter's theory is explained, not as evidence that the interpreter's theory is wrong, but as the subject's being "in denial". However, researchers note that in some cases of corroborated child sexual abuse, the victims sometimes make a series of partial confessions and recantations as they struggle with their own denial and the denial of abusers or family members. Use of denial theory in a legal setting therefore must be carefully regulated and experts' credentials verified. "Formulaic guilt" simply by "being a denier" has been castigated by English judges and academics. The main objection is that denial theory is founded on the premise that that which the supposed denier is denying is truth. This usurps the judge (and/or jury) as triers of fact.^[5]

The concept of denial is important in twelve-step programs, where the abandonment or reversal of denial forms the basis of the first, fourth, fifth, eighth and tenth steps. The ability to deny or minimize is an essential part of what enables an addict to continue his or her behavior despite evidence that—to an outsider—appears overwhelming. This is cited as one of the reasons that compulsion is seldom effective in treating addiction—the habit of denial remains.

When a family intervention is conducted to help a person engaged in self-destructive behavior such as alcohol or drug abuse to accept help for his problem, denial is sometimes reduced or eliminated altogether. This is not always necessary, however, for the intervention to be successful in having the person accept help.

Understanding and avoiding denial is also important in the treatment of various diseases. The American Heart Association cites denial as a principal reason that treatment of a heart attack is delayed. Because the symptoms are so varied, and often have other potential explanations, the opportunity exists for the patient to deny the emergency, often with fatal consequences. It is common for patients to delay mammograms or other tests because of a fear of cancer, even though this is clearly maladaptive. It is the responsibility of the care team, and of the nursing staff in particular, to train at-risk patients to avoid this behavior.

Contents

  [hide] 

• 1 Types
  • 1.1 Denial of fact
  • 1.2 Denial of responsibility
  • 1.3 Denial of impact
  • 1.4 Denial of cycle
  • 1.5 Denial of awareness
  • 1.6 Denial of denial
  • 1.7 DARVO
• 2 See also
• 3 Notes
• 4 References
• 5 Further reading

Types[edit]

Denial of fact[edit]

In this form of denial, someone avoids a fact by utilizing deception. This lying can take the form of an outright falsehood (commission), leaving out certain details to tailor a story (omission), or by falsely agreeing to something (assent, also referred to as "yessing" behavior). Someone who is in denial of fact is typically using lies to avoid facts they think may be painful to themselves or others.

Denial of responsibility[edit]

This form of denial involves avoiding personal responsibility by:

• blaming: a direct statement shifting culpability and may overlap with denial of fact
• minimizing: an attempt to make the effects or results of an action appear to be less harmful than they may actually be, or
• justifying: when someone takes a choice and attempts to make that choice look okay due to their perception of what is "right" in a situation.
• regression: when someone acts in a way unbecoming of their age (e.g. whining, temper tantrum, etc.)^[6]

Someone using denial of responsibility is usually attempting to avoid potential harm or pain by shifting attention away from themselves.

For example:

Troy breaks up with his girlfriend because he is unable to control his anger, and then blames her for everything that ever happened.

Denial of impact[edit]

Denial of impact involves a person's avoiding thinking about or understanding the harms of his or her behavior has caused to self or others, i.e. denial of the consequences. Doing this enables that person to avoid feeling a sense of guilt and it can prevent him or her from developing remorse or empathy for others. Denial of impact reduces or eliminates a sense of pain or harm from poor decisions.^[6]

Denial of cycle[edit]

Many who use this type of denial will say things such as, "it just happened". Denial of cycle is where a person avoids looking at their decisions leading up to an event or does not consider their pattern of decision making and how harmful behavior is repeated. The pain and harm being avoided by this type of denial is more of the effort needed to change the focus from a singular event to looking at preceding events. It can also serve as a way to blame or justify behavior (see above).

Denial of awareness[edit]

This form of denial attempts to divert pain by claiming that the level of awareness was inhibited by some mitigating variable. This is most typically seen in addiction situations where drug or alcohol abuse is a factor, though it also occasionally manifests itself in relation to mental health issues or the pharmaceutical substances used to treat mental health issues. This form of denial may also overlap with denial of responsibility.^[7]

Denial of denial[edit]

This can be a difficult concept for many people to identify with in themselves, but is a major barrier to changing hurtful behaviors. Denial of denial involves thoughts, actions and behaviors which bolster confidence that nothing needs to be changed in one's personal behavior. This form of denial typically overlaps with all of the other forms of denial, but involves more self-delusion. Denial at this level can have significant consequences both personally and at a societal level.^[8][9]

DARVO[edit]

Harassment covers a wide range of offensive behaviour. It is commonly understood as behaviour intended to disturb or upset. In the legal sense, it is behaviour which is found threatening or disturbing.

DARVO is an acronym to describe a common strategy of abusers: Deny the abuse, then Attack the victim for attempting to make them accountable for their offense, thereby Reversing Victim and Offender. This may involve gaslighting and victim blaming.

Psychologist Jennifer Freyd writes:

...I have observed that actual abusers threaten, bully and make a nightmare for anyone who holds them accountable or asks them to change their abusive behavior. This attack, intended to chill and terrify, typically includes threats of law suits, overt and covert attacks on the whistle-blower's credibility, and so on. The attack will often take the form of focusing on ridiculing the person who attempts to hold the offender accountable. [...] [T]he offender rapidly creates the impression that the abuser is the wronged one, while the victim or concerned observer is the offender. Figure and ground are completely reversed. [...] The offender is on the offense and the person attempting to hold the offender accountable is put on the defense.^[10]